🔴 Will Italy Be the Next Country to Leave the EU? (w Steve Diggle & Grant Williams)

🔴 Will Italy Be the Next Country to Leave the EU? (w Steve Diggle & Grant Williams)


GRANT WILLIAMS: The second leg of our journey
will take us through the Tuscan countryside from Florence to Siena, home of the world’s
oldest and possibly most troubled bank– Banca Monte dei Paschi. STEVE DIGGLE: So Siena– where we’re about
to arrive, when this traffic lets up– GRANT WILLIAMS: Hopefully. STEVE DIGGLE: –not a hugely important city,
though a very beautiful one– but in medieval Italy, one of the great trading centers and
Florence’s great rival for hundreds of years as a destination for merchants, and business,
and political influence. So they fought each other for centuries–
2 and 1/2 centuries, at least, on and off– in this very medieval way, which was– you
don’t actually do any of the fighting yourself. GRANT WILLIAMS: No. STEVE DIGGLE: You hire a mercenary– GRANT
WILLIAMS: Mercenary. Yep. STEVE DIGGLE: –made up of the scum of Europe–
English– –German, Swiss, Belgians– to do the fighting for you. And these are, really, quite small armies
but Siena didn’t actually formally come under the control of Florence until the 16th century,
when it was actually controlled by the Hapsburg Spanish. And they owed a great deal of money to the
Medici banking house. GRANT WILLIAMS: Didn’t everybody? STEVE DIGGLE: So the Medici acquired Siena
in a debt-for-equity swap. 2 and 1/2 centuries of fighting, but they’re
actually acquired in a financial transaction. And Florence having aborted, essentially,
in a debt-for-equity swap, then controlled the growth and development of Siena in the
traditional way– by imposing punitive taxes on the place, so that Florence was a much
better place to do business than Siena. And so Siena never grew, which has turned
out to be a great blessing for it. Everything’s still intact. Why is everything intact? Because no growth. However, despite being only 55,000 people
these days, they still have to have their own divisions, which they do. And you will find an interesting story about
the subdivisions of Siena, which I’ll tell you when we arrive. GRANT WILLIAMS: This is beautiful. Look at this. STEVE DIGGLE: Look at this. Look at this. Here’s a place with a population of, when
they built this, 80,000, 100,000. I mean, it’s a small town most anywhere else
in the world, but they thought they needed this. The scale of the ambition is amazing. So we’re in Florence, and now we’re in Siena,
only a few miles apart– mortal enemies. To this day, people in Siena still don’t like
Florentines. But when Sienese get together, they’re not
united. They’re part of these 17 contrada– 17 contrada. So the population of Siena these days is like
55,000 people– GRANT WILLIAMS: Is that all– 55,000? STEVE DIGGLE: Yeah. Florence ensured that this place would never
flourish, by having differential tax rates, which is interesting, right? Because you can fight someone for 2 and 1/2
centuries but if you really want to restrict it, you impose taxes on it– so drove all
the business to Florence. Florence flourished. Siena stopped developing. But when they’re together– they’re not united,
the Sienese, unless they’re fighting someone else. When they’re together they’re down to 17 different
districts, or the contrada, and that’s erasing the Palio– well, nine of the 17 qualify to
race here. And once again, this isn’t an affectation. These contrada– they really dislike each
other. GRANT WILLIAMS: Right. So let’s do the math. There’s what?– 3,000-odd people in each contrada. And I’m sure when the contrada get together,
they probably don’t like each other, either– probably family disputes, or something. But anyway– Giuseppe– we’re not talking
to him. STEVE DIGGLE: It’s a perfect and beautiful
representation of this Italian genius for division and internal fighting. So the contrada get together to fight the
Florentines. And then, I suppose, at some level, the Tuscans
get together to fight the Neapolitans– GRANT WILLIAMS: The — STEVE DIGGLE: The Milanese–
and then, rarely, rarely, do the Italians get together to fight someone else. Well, I mean almost never, because it wasn’t
a country that was reunited until 1870. GRANT WILLIAMS: Well, you see, I remember
when I first read that. And I had to go back and read it again. So I’m thinking, Italy has been a country
for less time than the United States, as we understand it– STEVE DIGGLE: About half the
time. GRANT WILLIAMS: Half the time– and yet, there’s
so much history here. So it’s such a contradiction. We’re in a place that feels like it’s just
stopped in time. STEVE DIGGLE: Yes. GRANT WILLIAMS: Just, I mean, if you look
around, it’s remarkable. Take away the awnings and the plate glass
in the front of the store– I mean, we’re centuries past. STEVE DIGGLE: Think about the wealth of this
place though. Population– let’s say 100,000 in the 14th
century. They built this. I mean, look at it– the ambition, the wealth,
the scale of the audacity. Most towns of 50,000 to 100,000 people do
not need a square this big or a municipal premises this big. So you go from a situation of enormous confidence,
optimism, wealth, to a place that really doesn’t grow for 600 years. GRANT WILLIAMS: Right. But when we talk about growth, which is a
big part of the debate about Europe and Italy, this idea that the Italian economy is smaller,
still, than it was in ’08, whereas other economies have grown– we think of this in a small way. But we’re sitting in the middle of somewhere
that hasn’t really grown for centuries. So that’s a possibility. It can happen. STEVE DIGGLE: But radical ecologists would
say, this is a great example of what happens when you stop growing and you preserve things. And they remain pristine and beautiful. GRANT WILLIAMS: But we get this idea of growth
on a world scale, where we’ve seen there was always either a country– a significant country
or region that was growing at a decent clip– 6%, 7%, 8%, 10%, 12% in Italy or China– and
the fact you’ve had that one significant– STEVE DIGGLE: Well, the reason you and I were
in Asia was because that was where the growth was. Right? I mean, you had half the world’s people, and
it was growing rapidly– first of all, Southeast Asia, then North Asia, then China– series
of huge boosts to global growth from hundreds of millions of people entering the global
workforce– becoming consumers– GRANT WILLIAMS: –and sucking in resources, sucking in labor–
We don’t seem to have that now. With China at 6 and 1/2% now– STEVE DIGGLE:
They say. GRANT WILLIAMS: They say. They say. STEVE DIGGLE: I think it’s probably more like
4 and 1/2%. GRANT WILLIAMS: Even so– but without that
engine of growth, are we entering a world where 2% to 3% is good– which it feels to
me we are, certainly in the West. And if so, what does that mean? What does that lower for longer mean? Because here, it means nothing. It means life goes on. And it means– this place is a moment in time
that people from all over the world want to come see, including the massive group behind
us that’s just emptied out of a coat somewhere. But what happens? Is that where the world is going to be now? STEVE DIGGLE: There’s no problem with growing
with 3% a year. Right? I mean, if you grow at 3% a year, it means
your economy doubles every generation. That’s not bad. GRANT WILLIAMS: No. It’s not. STEVE DIGGLE: On long-term historical perspective,
that’s pretty good, as long as you don’t have a massive war, or famine, or disease that–
GRANT WILLIAMS: Or– STEVE DIGGLE: –wipes you out. GRANT WILLIAMS: –unsupportable debt. STEVE DIGGLE: Ah, yes. Well that’s another matter. I mean, the only way that that sort of growth
becomes problematic is for two reasons. One, if you’re already very poor, that’s going
to be bad. Right? So if you’re stuck in a poverty trap, and
you’re growing slowly, then that’s going to cause a real level of dissent. The other thing is, if you enter a period
of low growth– and Italy is a great example of this– with too much debt– because the
only way you really ever truly dissolve debt is inflation or growth– GRANT WILLIAMS: Correct
STEVE DIGGLE: –neither of which we have. GRANT WILLIAMS: Right. So what does that mean for Italy? STEVE DIGGLE: So if you enter a period of
time where your demography is not constructive– Italian demography is not constructive– clearly,
immigration is highly problematic. What does that mean? It means that Italy and Japan obviously have
the worst– some of the worst– demographics in the world. And they both have huge levels of sovereign
debt. Right? In Japan, it’s now over– what? 200% and– GRANT WILLIAMS: 240%, I think it
is. STEVE DIGGLE: 240%. Italy’s– what? GRANT WILLIAMS: Here, it’s 130%? STEVE DIGGLE: 130%, yeah. So you’ve got an economy that’s still stuck
around $2 trillion. Sovereign debt’s around 2.4. And growth is, well, nil, for a decade. GRANT WILLIAMS: Yeah. Right. And that’s problematic. And– STEVE DIGGLE: That’s the problem. GRANT WILLIAMS: Exactly. STEVE DIGGLE: That’s the problem– servicing
and eventually maybe even possibly paying down the debt– that’s not likely to happen
any time soon– becomes increasingly problematic. That debt is what traps Italy inside this
box with the EU, because Italy needs to be a member of the European Union in order to
have low rates in order to service– it’s unserviceably high debt. Right? That’s why Quitaly is not going to happen. They can’t afford to because rates would double. That would mean, effectively, the entire Italian
budget would go to service of the debt. GRANT WILLIAMS: But if they do that, and they
go back to the lira, is there a possibility of a reset of some sort? I mean, obviously, it’s going to ripple. There’s going to be– STEVE DIGGLE: This is
not– GRANT WILLIAMS: — STEVE DIGGLE: –something that Italy hasn’t been through before. Not without a default. GRANT WILLIAMS: Right. No. STEVE DIGGLE: Not without a default. GRANT WILLIAMS: Exactly right. STEVE DIGGLE: But that’s happened before–
GRANT WILLIAMS: Sure. For it to happen to a G7 country would be
astonishing, but is that a way out for Italy? STEVE DIGGLE: It’s a way out, but it’s a bit
like dropping the H bomb, isn’t it? GRANT WILLIAMS: Yeah. But if you’re prepared– if we are getting
down to the negotiation stage of this– if you’re prepared to put that on the table–
which, let’s face it. The Greeks were. The Greeks put that on the table– fudged
it, obviously. We don’t know what kind of backroom deals
were made with the Greeks or backroom pressure put on them. So there’s no– didn’t seem any deal made. But they got the bailout they needed. If you’re prepared, which the League and 5Star
claim to be– to go to any lengths to stick it to the Europeans– could we see that as
some kind of standoff, do you think? STEVE DIGGLE: I think the fact that, as you
mentioned, Italy is a G7 country– maybe it’s someone in Congress, it is. The pride that Italy has in itself is on a
different level to the Greeks, I think. I mean, there are certain similarities, but
there’s some very important differences. I mean, this place is a testament to the pride
the Italians feel– GRANT WILLIAMS: Sure. STEVE DIGGLE: –in themselves and their achievements. So I think it’s unlikely to end up there. But in a sufficiently antagonistic situation,
given the domestic situation in Italy and the increasing frustration of Italians with
Brussels, I don’t think it’s impossible. So if they want to have more fiscal stimulus
and some way to break out– if they break out, the monetary rates go higher. So that’s the trap. GRANT WILLIAMS: Well, this is why sitting
here is so apposite to talking about this– because at that point, they necessarily, I
guess, all become Italians again. And Italy becomes one contrada inside Europe. And the Grillos and the Northern Leagues of
the world are fighting for their contrada in amongst this wider scope. And if you galvanize Italians into that kind
of frame of mind, who knows what you can achieve? STEVE DIGGLE: Yes. Possibly. I mean, clearly, that’s a possibility. It strikes me as pretty unlikely. I mean, one of the other Achilles’ heels that
Italy has is not just its sovereign debt– it’s this banking crisis, which is one the
reasons we should come here to Siena– because the banks are in a very poor state and have
remained in a poor state. They never really recovered since 2007. They’ve been in a state of either denial or
denying how bad the problem is, but against total borrowings of $2.2 trillion– about
one times GDP– approximately 11% to 12% of that is nonperforming. GRANT WILLIAMS: Well, I mean, as you said,
the beauty of being here in Siena, just up that hill, is one of the oldest banks in the
world. STEVE DIGGLE: I think it’s the world’s oldest
continuously operating bank, established in 1472. GRANT WILLIAMS: So it feels rude for us to
talk about Italian banks without– can we go and take a look at Monte dei Paschi? So maybe we’ll just get the check, finish
our coffees, and go and take a look up there. What do you reckon? STEVE DIGGLE: Good. GRANT WILLIAMS: Alright. The fate of Italy’s banking system, for better
or worse, seems inexorably tied to its place at the heart of the European Union. The fragility of Italy’s banks mirrors that
of the country as a whole, and their reliance upon state aid and low interest rates have
placed them in increasingly perilous situation. STEVE DIGGLE: Here we are– Monte Paschi. Monte dei Paschi– world’s oldest continuously
operating bank and pretty nice building. GRANT WILLIAMS: Beautiful. STEVE DIGGLE: Here’s a guy who’s just seen
the balance sheet of the current Monte Paschi. He’s not looking very happy about this. GRANT WILLIAMS: It’s just reason. STEVE DIGGLE: So formed in 1472– Monte dei
Paschi– Mound of Piety. So it was formed as a charitable organization
whose profits all went to charity in the local area, and that’s carried on even to this day. 1472– continuously operated. GRANT WILLIAMS: Yeah. So six– almost six centuries. STEVE DIGGLE: Almost six centuries. 400– no. 572 years as a private enterprise continuously
operated– went public in 1999. Since then, in the last 18 years, it’s had
three government bailouts. GRANT WILLIAMS: It’s extraordinary, isn’t
it? I mean, it’s truly extraordinary. And it speaks volumes about what we spoke
about– incentives, responsibilities– right here. I mean, it’s writ large. STEVE DIGGLE: After they IPO’d in 1999, they
trebled the balance sheet in seven years. Stock hit an all time high of current money–
because it’s been recapitalized several times now– EUR 9,300 in the summer of ’07– GRANT
WILLIAMS: Perfect. STEVE DIGGLE: –current price around EUR 1.6–
so you really want to meet the guy who paid 9,300. GRANT WILLIAMS: Right. STEVE DIGGLE: –and find out what his strategy
is for breaking even. GRANT WILLIAMS: Well, yeah. I average down, obviously. GRANT WILLIAMS: You’re in at 4 and 1/2 grand,
and things are looking better. STEVE DIGGLE: It may be a lesson to people
on averaging down. No. So what happened here? They trebled the balance sheet. And then when ’08 came, and everything got
really bad really quickly, ultimately, 45% of their entire debt base was considered to
be non-performing. GRANT WILLIAMS: 45%– I mean, how do you find
that many bad credits? STEVE DIGGLE: And a third of it is still essentially
non-performing. So a third of the $150 billion that they created–
or $100 billion they created anew. When you actually look into what happened,
I mean, this is obviously the worst. But UniCredit was 207 euros in the summer
of ’07– 11 right now. So it wasn’t that Monte Paschi was unusual,
right? Keynes’s famous rule, right? If you’re a banker, the one thing you must
never do is fail idiosyncratically. Right? GRANT WILLIAMS: Right. STEVE DIGGLE: Always fail together. And they all did the same thing. It’s just, these guys did it more and more
aggressively and from a smaller capital base. And they were trying to catch up. GRANT WILLIAMS: But that mindset change from
a 500-year-old institution– how does that happen so fast? Because new guys come in– OK. We’ve got a great idea because we need to
grow– how about we list– It’ll be great. We get access to more capital. I mean, it’s– STEVE DIGGLE: And we’ll be
able to create an incentive to attract real talent, because then we’ll have a currency. So then we’ll be able to offer incentives. We’ll be able to offer bonuses. And what did the bank want to do? Wanted to expand its balance sheet. So what were the managers being incentivized
to do? Expand the balance sheet– not make a profit–
not make a– GRANT WILLIAMS: Lend more money. STEVE DIGGLE: –but make a solid, long-term
financial organization expand the balance sheet. That’s what we’re going to incentivize you
to do. And you’ve got to say, they did it. 300% increase. GRANT WILLIAMS: Well, they did, but– STEVE
DIGGLE: –in seven years. That’s pretty good. GRANT WILLIAMS: Everybody watching it uses
that as their metric to evaluate. The whole thing is so circuitous, that we’re
going to expand the balance sheet. We’re going to lend more money. And the people watching it go, they’re lending
more money. This is great for the business. The business is growing. It’s– I mean, it’s ludicrous– STEVE DIGGLE:
Why would you ever value a business on revenues? Why would you ever value a business on revenues? I can sell you $1 at 99 cents all day. My revenues are going to look spectacular. GRANT WILLIAMS: Sure. STEVE DIGGLE: I have no idea. Why would anyone want a business with lots
of revenues? You actually want, just, a business that makes
a profit. Now, banking does make a profit. Look at this. They built this with profits. GRANT WILLIAMS: From a bench over there–
STEVE DIGGLE: From a bench– GRANT WILLIAMS: –to this. STEVE DIGGLE: It’s a profitable business,
if you do it right. But if you do it badly, you can run out of
money extremely quickly. GRANT WILLIAMS: And go out of business. But that’s the whole point, right? It’s a really simple business to grow steadily. If you want to start growing exponentially,
the only way to do it is to take unnecessary risks. Right? That’s the way. STEVE DIGGLE: So why is the Italian banking
situation so much worse than most other places? It wasn’t that they did anything extraordinary. Monte Paschi had a specific derivatives catastrophe,
and the lending was reckless. But all the other banks are somewhat similar. I mean, they’re obviously better– GRANT WILLIAMS:
In all the other countries, this is a common or garden banking problem. STEVE DIGGLE: It’s 68% owned by the government,
by the way, now. So the IPO has been 2/3 reversed anyway. GRANT WILLIAMS: Sure. STEVE DIGGLE: It used to be owned by a mound
of piety. Now– It’s 68% owned by the Italian taxpayer,
who’s really underwater as well. So what went wrong here is just another chapter
in the story, which is– this is what banks do when credit conditions are eased and they’re
under an incentive to expand their balance sheet. It’s not really fundamentally different to
what happened in America. GRANT WILLIAMS: No. STEVE DIGGLE: But there is one major difference,
which is that, since 2008 the American economy has expanded. It’s now significantly bigger than it was
in 2008. That means, even those bad debts, eventually,
they get dissolved. Right? I mean, eventually, economic growth solves
all your problems. You haven’t had economic growth in Italy for
10 years. You’ve got 55 million people– most of them
employed– most of them doing a good job. And you’ve seen zero economic growth. And that’s what makes the Italian problem
so serious, because without growth, you can’t grow your way out of your problems. And you’re stuck. You’re not lending. Well, we know they’re not lending because
we have this huge credit problem in Italy in 2013, 2014, where no one could get credit. We haven’t been able to get credit on anything
we’ve tried to do here. So credit’s effectively dried up. So what’s your plan? Your plan is to work out of your way out your
bad debts? Well, guess what? For that, you need rising asset prices for
that. You need– GRANT WILLIAMS: Correct. STEVE DIGGLE: –economic growth. So it’s a huge problem. And it’s not getting any better. In fact, you can see the fact that the share
prices have all collapsed. I mean, there was a reasonable banks in them. Monte Paschi got back to, like, 1,100 in the
summer of 2014. GRANT WILLIAMS: One last chance to lose all
your money, if you’re a trader. STEVE DIGGLE: You’re only down 90% at that
point. GRANT WILLIAMS: Yeah. Right. Exactly. But this is the thing– all these bounces. If you look at the underlying business, no
one’s buying this stuff because the business is getting it. They’re buying it because it’s gone from 9,000
to whatever. There’s a bounce here. And so these things just become trading vehicles. You’ve got all the debt– the sovereign debt
of Italy is now littered across the balance sheets across Europe– the banks here– the
banks of France. There’s 9 billion Italian sovereign debt on
French balance sheets. German banks are stuffed to the gills with
this stuff. It just keeps going around, and around, and
around. STEVE DIGGLE: Well, France and Spain together
have pretty much the same level of bad bank non-performing loans as Italy, but Italy is
concentrated. It’s larger. And there’s no economic growth. So that really ties the current banks into
the political crisis. GRANT WILLIAMS: Right. Of course. STEVE DIGGLE: Because the Italian government
owes the world EUR $2.4 trillion. The bans have lent about a similar amount,
and at least 10%– probably more like 12%, 13% of it– is bad. That means they need the EU to continue to
support them. So that makes things a bit more difficult. But one thing that I keep coming back to is,
why isn’t the Italian economy growing? Look around. Right? It’s the fifth most visited country in the
world for a reason. It’s beautiful. It’s fecund. It exports things all around the world. They make things that people want, unlike
Greece. I mean, they make furniture. They make clothes. They design beautiful buildings. GRANT WILLIAMS: Cars. STEVE DIGGLE: Make good cars, right? So what the hell is going on? Why aren’t they growing? And yes, consistently, the message from Italian
politics is, we’ve got to blame Brussels. And I say, yeah. OK. I see that. And I have a lot of sympathy for it. But look at the situation in Italy that stops
the economy growing. What is it? It’s not the people. It’s not the geography. It’s not the talent. What is stopping this place growing is the
suffocating bureaucracy. And have a look at yourself, right? As one Italian says to another in one of Shakespeare’s
plays, “It is not the fault, dear Brutus, lies not in our stars, but in– GRANT WILLIAMS
AND STEVE DIGGLE: –ourselves– STEVE DIGGLE: –that we are underlings.” This country is 75th in the World League of
ease of starting a business. GRANT WILLIAMS: Right. STEVE DIGGLE: It’s below the Democratic Republic
of Congo. That’s not Brussels. GRANT WILLIAMS: No. STEVE DIGGLE: That’s Italy. GRANT WILLIAMS: That’s true. STEVE DIGGLE: It ranks 111th in getting credit–
well, partly, thanks to these guys having no more money. GRANT WILLIAMS: It’s just remarkable, right? Exactly. STEVE DIGGLE: It ranks 112th in paying taxes. 112th. It’s a G7 country. It ranks 112th. It’s behind another 111 countries. There’s only 175 in the entire index. GRANT WILLIAMS: Right. STEVE DIGGLE: It’s not just about Brussels. It’s about this system that you’ve created
that suffocates entrepreneurial flair– and deters people from coming here, and starting
businesses, and growing businesses. And these guys are a classic example of that
because you’ve got to have a functioning banking system. So for a window of about four years, these
guys– Boba Monte, as they’re known, Father Monte–. Anyone could just rock up with a stupid business
plan and walk away on a check, right? Particularly if they were local. And then all of a sudden, that doesn’t work
out. And now you can’t have a penny, even if you’ve
got a great business plan. It’s a terrible way of running things. And then, probably most depressing of all,
it continues to rank really badly on this global perception of corruption– about 54th,
I think. GRANT WILLIAMS: Right. STEVE DIGGLE: –just behind Namibia. GRANT WILLIAMS: Right. STEVE DIGGLE: –one ahead of Saudi Arabia–
G7 country. GRANT WILLIAMS: So in terms of coming out
of this– the one thing you can rely on is that, at some point, credit will be extended
willy-nilly again. We have to get through the phase where they
shut the doors and go right, we can’t extend credit to anybody. So if there is some hope, it’s that we all
get crazy again, at some point, when the all-clear is sounded. STEVE DIGGLE: Yeah. I mean, that’s fine. Right? I mean, to a certain extent, that will alleviate
some of the symptoms. But the underlying cause remains that in a
country that ought to be one of the most prosperous in Europe, a system that is weighing this
place down and stopping it growing continues to be in place– and is hardly being challenged. I mean, Macron, to a degree, in France, is
talking about some of these issues. We need to work harder. We need to remove impediments to incentives. We need to find a way of encouraging growth. That debate’s not happening in Italy. Right? I mean, the 5Star Movement are talking about
massive subsidies for everyone. We’ve suffered enough. Let’s open the spigot. The League, actually, for all of their populism–
somewhat crazy nonsense and sometimes racism– do have a strong platform of support for small
businesses. At least fair enough for that. But really, the debate is all about immigrants. It’s all about bad Brussels– throwing off
the shackles of these people who’ve oppressed us. Well, you know who’s really oppressing you? This ridiculously oppressive system of red
tape, regulation, rules, inflexible, local bureaucrats, too much regulation, too much
corruption– everything’s hard– hard getting a permit, hard paying your taxes, hard establishing
anything. And so on, and so on, and so on. And these guys just represent a monumental
failure to support business. That’s what banks are supposed to do– to
equity and debt. Debt can be syndicated through a bond market
or it can come from banks. It’s not hard. GRANT WILLIAMS: No. It’s not. STEVE DIGGLE: It’s not hard. GRANT WILLIAMS: And when I look at this, that’s
the thing that I find so disappointing in the whole thing– because it’s the same mistake
that gets made over, and over, and over again. This is nothing new under the sun. It’s a common or garden banking crisis. Well, I mean, what an awful thing to be in
existence. STEVE DIGGLE: Well, if you really want a lesson
on why a stock that is falling a lot is not cheap, this is the one. GRANT WILLIAMS: Yeah. Exactly right. STEVE DIGGLE: Right? Stock down 90% can still fall another 99%
if it has a bad business– even if it’s a big business. GRANT WILLIAMS: The catastrophic destruction
of a 500-year-old banking institution through misaligned incentives, aided by access to
artificially cheap capital, is emblematic of all that ails not just Italy, but the world
in 2019. And the interconnectedness of Europe’s bank
and government debt ties them all together in the worst way imaginable. But it’s not all the fault of Brussels bureaucrats. When you see Monte dei Paschi, it kind of
crystallizes what an absurd situation the whole thing is. I mean, this institution’s been around for
centuries. STEVE DIGGLE: 6 and 1/2, right? I mean, you’d think they would have managed
to have spotted a few pitfalls in the road over 6 and 1/2– GRANT WILLIAMS: Well, and
they probably did. What they didn’t spot what a currency union,
and the pressures that all this massive securitization, and that chase for profits– that hunger for
just turning another dollar instead of being bankers. I mean, it’s criminal, frankly. It’s a shame. Really is. STEVE DIGGLE: Well, whether it’s criminal
or not, I guess, needs to be made to be seen. But it’s a testament to how fragile things
become when everyone chases the next quarter. GRANT WILLIAMS: Exactly. Exactly. STEVE DIGGLE: And I think this is something
that you and Tony Deden covered. GRANT WILLIAMS: Yeah. We did. STEVE DIGGLE: –in quite a lot of detail. And I think, for a lot of people, that was
an interesting perspective on things because, clearly, a lot of investors spend an awful
lot of time looking for the next quarterly results. Early traders live and die by those things. But ultimately, what happens over the next
90 days doesn’t really matter. And I think one of the history teaches you
is that, if you want to survive long-term, you need to be looking further down the road
than the next 90 days. And you need to be planning for further than
the next 90 days. And there’s a lot of criticism of short-term-ism
in banking, in finance, and the way companies are run. But this comes back to the whole nature of–
capitalism rests on the proposition that people respond to incentives. And if you have company executives that are
being incentivized or banking executives that are being incentivized to make money every
90 days or every 180 days, they’re going to do that. GRANT WILLIAMS: Of course. Yeah of course. STEVE DIGGLE: They’re going to do that. There’s probably no greater example in American
banking history than the transformation of Goldman Sachs from the private partnership
to a limited company. GRANT WILLIAMS: And then on to a listed company–
STEVE DIGGLE: A listed company. GRANT WILLIAMS: –and into a bank holding
company, right? STEVE DIGGLE: Well, yes. But a listed company– and quite a lot of
people were like, when did Goldman Sachs change from this organization of bankers who were
looking after an organization that had lasted a long time and planning for the next generation,
to be one that was just looking forward to the next earnings date? And the answer is– the IPO– Fundamental
change in the way the organization ran itself and behaved. And it’s just the same here. I mean, you’ve got Italian executives– but
all people under tremendous short-term pressure to produce constantly good results. And of course, it’s nonsense– businesses,
economies, life is cyclical. You’re going to have downturns. You can’t just turf everyone out because you’ve
just had a weak quarter. But it’s the way people respond. And to a certain extent, I’ve got some sympathy
for the executives because, having run a hedge fund– which I was trying to run for a cycle,
because we were long volatility, and you don’t always get volatility. But eventually you do. And you’re under tremendous pressure to make
money every month. I’m like, it’s really hard to run a fund for
an economic cycle when investors are tapping you on the shoulder to make money for every
30 days. GRANT WILLIAMS: Well, I mean, that’s just
gotten worse. And this year, this thing about listing is,
obviously, everyone that is, then, involved in running the company, sadly, can check and
does check their net worth– GRANT WILLIAMS AND STEVE DIGGLE: –every five minutes. GRANT WILLIAMS: And so you can’t help but
take your eye off the ball because, suddenly, you have a bad day. You can crystallize that and go, oh my god. This cost me x today. And it freaks people out. I mean, it’s backwards–. STEVE DIGGLE: So what does that mean? Listing’s a bad idea? GRANT WILLIAMS: No. I’m not saying listing’s a bad idea. But I think if your remuneration is so tightly
tied up to the share price, I understand– STEVE DIGGLE: So it’s an alignment. GRANT WILLIAMS: It’s poor incentive. STEVE DIGGLE: It’s an alignment. It’s poor incentives. GRANT WILLIAMS: It’s always an alignment. You said this to me so many times when we
worked together. You have to get the incentives right. If you get the incentives right, the results
will go the way you want. If you get the alignment– the incentives–
wrong, you’re going to get bad results. I mean, it’s been proven time and time again. STEVE DIGGLE: What do you think of this idea
that you shouldn’t get a vote in a company until you’ve held the shares for a certain
period of time? You can’t just turn up two minutes before
the vote and– GRANT WILLIAMS: I think it’s a great idea, frankly. I really do. I mean, I understand– so if you got a share,
you deserve a vote. But if we want to try and create stability–
and even though there’s an illusion right now that we don’t need to, because everything’s
fine– we do. I mean, this is a very fragile economic system. That’s a great way to go about it. STEVE DIGGLE: So what would the curing period
be? 30 days? 90 days? 180 days? GRANT WILLIAMS: For me, I would rather it
be longer– STEVE DIGGLE: Really? GRANT WILLIAMS: –than shorter. Yeah. I do, because I think if what you really want
people voting who have a long-term interest in the company– not who are trying to make
a change to effect some kind of short-term outcome– that’s dangerous to me. STEVE DIGGLE: Isn’t that somewhat going to
change the way stock markets work? GRANT WILLIAMS: But how do they work right
now? I mean, do they work right now? I would argue that perhaps they don’t because
the idea of price discovery, and the idea of markets reacting to news the way they’ve
always reacted to news, is completely gone. They just don’t do that any more. STEVE DIGGLE: Well, I mean, between the algos,
and the computers, and the ETFs, you’ve got a big chunk of company ownership being held
by computers who don’t have a view– and ETFs, who are essentially passive. GRANT WILLIAMS: Exactly right. And for me, seeing Monte dei Paschi– seeing
this 5-centuryold– STEVE DIGGLE: 6 and 1/2. GRANT WILLIAMS: 6-and-1/2-century-old institution
that has been brought to its knees by this change and this renewed focus on short-term
profits– it speaks so loud to me. It’s almost deafening. STEVE DIGGLE: Yeah. GRANT WILLIAMS: Before we headed back to Steve’s
to discuss the investment implications of what we’ve seen, we had one more stop to make–
the wall town of Cortona, where we would discuss, perhaps, the thorniest issue facing Italy–
immigration. STEVE DIGGLE: Italians are looking for a European
solution. But when it comes to allowing immigrants in,
everyone gets very nationalistic. I think your point is exactly right, which
is that, back in the status quo– and that Europe always winning and everything holding
together has been a reasonably good trade– Brexit excepted. I think that level of complacency is very
dangerous.

Posts created 18780

100 thoughts on “🔴 Will Italy Be the Next Country to Leave the EU? (w Steve Diggle & Grant Williams)

  1. Interest on excess reserves is a real time example of bank balance sheet expansion ring fenced around a dubious middle class?

  2. One thing Italy has which was not mentioned in this documentary
    is 3000 tons of gold.
    They are not giving that up, even if they default or cannot pay their euro/dollar debts.

    I suspect that 3000 tons of gold will form the basis of their new national currency at some point.

  3. My take on Bankers is they always pretend that their losing money when in reality they are stealing it. If two average intelligent men can talk and discuss and somewhat resolve or come up with resolutions , than ask yourself how cannot Bankers not know what to do being in the business for 572 years ?

  4. so refreshing to hear financial experts and not feel they are deliberately trying to obfuscate and mislead their audience with obtuse references and concepts while blatantly shilling for some vested interest.

  5. Another great program thanks guys. I always wondered why there hasn't been a banking run on the likes of Monte Dei Paschi-Carige banks, this regional support maybe the reason. Crazy situation where the likes of Unicredit are now having to financially support the smaller Italian banks which are in financial trouble.

  6. The EURO collapses; Ezekiel 7: 19 Revelation 18: 17 causing a banking systems freeze-up with Lehman falling onto banks all around the world. This is a major crisis, what will powers do about it? They will engage in WARS and WRATH. Jeremiah 25: 24-26 Revelation 11: 18.

  7. Some relevant hard facts are cited after 22 minutes into this video.
    Italy is ranked 75th in the world for 'ease in starting a business', 111th in 'getting credit', 112th in 'paying taxes', and about 54th in 'corruption'.

  8. by far one of the best if not the best i have ever watched and wanted to listen throughout without any distraction covering all angles and incorporating the historical facts, i hope these guys go on to produce more of these videos

  9. No one leaves the EU. The EU is an authoritarian socialist entity. The future of Europe is an United States of Europe..

    'Winston Churchill, 1945'

  10. THE NEW GOVERNMENT IS GOING TO OPEN THE PORTS AND IMPORT MASSIVE OF ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS ….. WHICH IS GOING TO PROVOKE THE PEOPLE TO REMOVE THEM"GOVERNMENT " AND GET OUT EUROPE …. BECAUSE THE PEOPLE ARE OVER 40 PERCENT UNEMPLOYED AND THE GOVERNMENT IS DOING NOTHING THEM …. BUT GIVING EVERYTHING TO ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS…. I SAW THE OTHER DAY AGRIGENTO ,,, WHO IS EMPLOYING BLACK ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS WHEN OVER 60 PERCENT OF SICILIANS ARE UNEMPLOYED……. IN OCTEBER I WILL DO AN VIDEO ABOUT IT WHEN I RETURN FROM FRANCE

  11. Nobody will leave EU and there will not be brexit for England because the mafia inn EU have to much power and fake biased MSM suport EU

  12. WE NEED TO BREAK AWAY FROM EUROPE SOCALLED eeC….. AND ITALY WILL REBUILT FAST …. AS WITHOUT ITALY MOST OF EUROPE WOULD NOT EAT WELL…….. RONALD RAY MANGIARACINA

  13. BUSINESS DONOT NEED TO EXPAND THE BALANCE SHEET …. NEED TO EXPAND THE PROFITS…. RONALD RAY MANGIARACINA….. THEY SHOULD HAVE PAY ATTENTION TO PROFITS

  14. What is stopping the Italian economic growth is the Lateran Treaty and the Vatican Banks ability to loot the economy for the benefit of financial "Condottieri" that are hooked in… and take assets and tax base beyond the reach of the Italian economy.

  15. If the Brits don't get their backsides into gear very soon the Italians may get there before them. Britain has too many Internationalists / Globalists deep within the establishment that Brexit is having a hard time getting adopted.

  16. If Italy went back to the Lira, Florin or Ducat, the Circulating Euros (M2) is enough to cover the entire debt and so obliging conversion to Florins issued by the state (not the central bank) the Florins cost zero and the Euros collected in the conversion would pay off the debt overnight, actually.

  17. europe has old archaic mindset….they might have history and some industrial achievements and profiting from it till this day, however it's all rigid, old fashioned and somewhat stuck up…..i am from europe, the mean east europe, which is one of the worst regions for cold mean people, but even I can recognize that the only hope for the bright future is united states of america, the continent of hope, freedom and innovation.

  18. Globalism is killing economies in the west. Jobs transferred to Asia for the benefit of the middle man. National economic sovereignty
    not globalism is the solution. The blood sucker middle men don't like that.

  19. Yes, there is no absolute necessity to grow, not everywhere and all of the time, but the truth is that the worlds capacity and resources to do so, given just a sensible amount of stewardship is much larger then we are led to believe. This place is enormous, as well as enormously abundant, while its current population almost vanishingly small. Not only that, it is very much concentrated in towns and cities which cover a very tiny fraction of even the most densely populated countries. It is estimated that the entire population of the world can easily stand at arms length on an area half the size of the Isles of White. Having said that, the World's population is no longer growing, and is estimated to start to exponentially fall in no more than 10 years. So what's the problem? The problem is that the elites don't like being so vastly outnumbered by their farm animals, that's us BTW, while keeping a large number of them deliberately in a state of obedient and dependant slavery, is becoming increasingly difficult to sustain. Therefore they set up the Ecology Movement, while one of these mega wealthy and powerful elites had the brass neck to put his own son at the head of it, namely David Rothschild. Maybe it would be nice for a change, if we concentrated on bringing the rest of the world up to our living standards, instead of doing all in our power bringing our own, down to theirs? The population won't grow, indeed it may very well continue to fall, but it would be nice if those that do come into this world, could enjoy a reasonable long life of plenty, instead of an artificially contrived short and painful one. Just saying.

  20. The lesson is, never ever go public. Six centuries of stability undone.
    America is growing because they found oil. It is not that they changed their practices into something better.
    How long until reality catches up again? If a gambler wins a large sum, he is doing ok for a while.

  21. So as the UN dream collapses, how will America ultimately control the world, join church and state and control the world. It’s to be the new world order and it will take control quickly and the world will grow with it

  22. French economic situation is the same as in Italy.
    Any effort is possible for economic growth when a country has no sovereignty of economy and currency.
    And it's economy is controlled by groupe of people from EU chosen by banking cartel .

  23. Great series. What’s with the red button symbol in the title of each episode? Seems a bit click baity for such quality content.

  24. If the the northern part of Italy – the Po Valley to Bolgnia – cut it self off from the rest of Italy it would have an economy rivaling Germany. Therefore, Northern Italy would be better off leaving the rest of Italy to garibaldi, Cavour and his inheritors who produce nothing, not leave the EU. Southern Italy could not afford to leave a Christmas Club and is a drain on the Italian economy funded by the industrial north. Rome is the political capital of Italy but produces nothing. Why then would Italy leave the EU??? Its a load of Right Wing political hype based on an inundation of illegal immigrants. Why would Italy leave the EU and have to pick-up the tab on its own for either blocking all immigration or funding the refugee problem.

  25. In Napoleon Hill's Think and Grow Rich… or was it Forbes.. The statement was that CEO's were quick to making changes.. So in actuality they were news driven… Instead of sticking to the plan . (i think that was what I read)

  26. do it you Italian people for the sake of your country . and do us a great favour and reject of an extension of the u.k.

  27. More than enough time/resources has been spent on the ‘’Brexit issue’’. Overwhelming number of People of United Kingdom are fed-up on Brexit cock-up. We wish/like to witness elections ASAP & aspire ‘’ToryeXIT’’ to take place and let new govt. come into being. The last referendum on ‘leaving/staying’ took place nearly four years ago and so it has become ‘time barred’.
    Democracy means Jeremy is elected to lead his party. He must lead and his party ought to follow him. Overwhelming belief is that under Jeremy Corbin's leadership labour may win the next general elections. He is a clever and articulate person no doubt. He (Jeremy) appears to be smarter/reliable/modest than his counterpart(s) in the Conservative party. Conservatives it is apparent from their posture in politics that they have been through, as they say a ‘blow hot blow cold’ situation. But we are convinced at this juncture that their ability/agility/reliability is ‘stone cold’ now. British ought to elect new party/parliamentarians to run the country ASAP. SDLP looks promising also, that people may support with confidence in the next elections.

  28. It's a bad place to do business is my summary: Corruption, territory feuds, nationalism against outsiders but tribalism amongst citizens, business regulations, byzantine bureaucracy, debt, etc. But I hate to say it, and I like Italy and it's culture, but it…has always been that way hasn't it. From Rome, to the Middle Ages of warring city-states, to Capulet vs Montague blood feuds, to the Papacy, mob, racist soccer fans, etc.

  29. This was fantastic and a real pleasure to watch. Around the 30 min mark there is a discussion about short term thinking and a point was made about Capitalism. I thought the point was going to be about Human nature rather than Capitalism. Of course, a system will either safeguard or encourage the worst elements of Human nature. Capitalism does have some inherent flaws, even though i consider myself a Capitalist. I've always felt that Capitalism works, when society puts morals and ethics first. If not, whether we are in a Capitalist system or any other system, it won't really matter. The rot will still set in. So what we must first look at, are principles themselves. Capitalism needs to be principled again. We know it produces great wealth and it highly productive, but it cannot run in an environment of unbridled greed. The old banks were effectively gatekeepers. The gatekeepers have mostly gone.

  30. Foreigners talking truth about Italy. Very interesting and revealing. Perhaps more impartial than native Italians. Well done!

  31. The Greeks got the bailouts that THE EUROPEAN BANKS needed. The whole bailout scam was to transfer European taxpayer money to the shareholders of the big banks. Nothing else.

  32. Nice Gentlemen, but don't believe much that they say. Globalists always blame the people for lack of growth saying they don't want Immigration so we will never grow. No, the people want Immigration but not an invasion from people that don't want to integrate; they only want to take over. Keep these kind out.

  33. An interesting and relaxed conversation by this formidable duo !! What is out of step is that we have evidence that the Fed has already reversed Q.E. ,interest rates are heading down in the USA and yield curve has inverted .

  34. Italy has been used as a dumping ground by the EU and the people have had enough . A combination of circumstances will eventually take the country out of the EU .

  35. There's NO bureaucracy in bitcoin….go figure!
    Like the difference between going to church and being the church similarly its time to BE the bank (eg bitcoin) in stead of going to the bank!!

  36. Italy’s debt problem is that it doesn’t have it’s own central bank and local currency. If they did they could have their CB monetize the debt. Then rig the government inflation statistics to under report the real inflation rate. Consequently, the rest of the inflation gets counted as ‘growth’. Problem solved, just like in China and the USA. It’s not real growth but all their economists and government officials will pat themselves on the back and talk about how brilliant they are that they’ve solved the growth problem. Being a member of the European Union is such a drag in these circumstances.

  37. 2 old guys talking about the past, and the greatness of that past … and never mentioned once, that the youth of Italy have never been produced. The under 30 population is 25 %… it must be over 45 %…

  38. pizza and pasta…i would miss the italians.if they didnt follow us out……come on italy….get off your knees and join the brits……

  39. The only thing that's happened it Italy is corruption has become more proftiable and more expensive. EU funded "projects"… or job generation schemes where millions just seems to disappear. Even their 3rd public sector is riddled with corruption and sky-high public funded salaries.

  40. Why they do not mention the public money England, France, Germany have spent to save their own banks?! So much more of what the Italian government has spent (just 1% of his GDP against the 4-5% of France, UK and Germany). These English gentlemen are clearly Brexiteers 😉 A part from that omission… their analysis about Italy is exellent

  41. As the central banking system fails, and the Italians are now aware that the euro has literally transferred much of the country's wealth to Germany, the EU, to keep its hold on Italy, has to depend on fake news and bought-and-paid-for politicians.

  42. 33:00 This I disagree with. Speculation plays an outsized role in today's market place, I agree, but fundamentally, speculation serves the important purpose of facilitating quick and smooth price fluctuations, responding to market signals, etc. Its essential to a dynamic economy.

  43. Banks are just a tool box. Where this toolbox does not hold spinners or screwdrivers but promissory notes. The fee for these promissory notes should only be the cost to manage this note. No profit on the note only the management of the note.

  44. But of course not.
    As Poland, Hungary and many more members they will complain and talk a lot about it. But they are getting HUGE amounts of money from the EU – and they like money; they are going nowhere.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top