Britain’s Real Monarch (British History Documentary) | Timeline

Britain’s Real Monarch (British History Documentary) | Timeline

Posts created 28315

100 thoughts on “Britain’s Real Monarch (British History Documentary) | Timeline

  1. Praise be to God and by decrees by God's Grace the British Royalty of Succession is a devine anointment throughout the 'ages' the Royal Nexus of Nobality is necessary for Humane facilitation encumbant to represent the voice of the people
    – The Heir to the Legitamacy of the Sovereignty is via a Male blood line. An accepted dominion of plausible Titles of Morality.

  2. Yo did not trace the real royal family, its always been the FritzGearlds, This is all lies, Gods design was for the FritzGearlds, the Winsdor name came from Fritzgearld, The name Winsdor was a first name, It was Winsdor De Gearld. Gog designed proof in the dna of the ruleing bloodline, There is designed proof of the real King is supposed to be and its not the Hastings or the Hanovers nor queen eLIESabeth -Saxe-Gotha

  3. Why does the host keep trying to imply this is "his" theory? This theory has been around long before this cuck thought of it. We've known this for years.

  4. You have to remember, if the alternative happened, he wouldnt have gone to Aussie. He could have had the same scam znd shameblex we have now.

    The Throne seat should be like Jury service with all the public having a day on the Throne,

    Its 2019 now, and a change of the House is becoming, Brexit ripping and the Queem now retiring at age on 95 (2021). Another revolution is becoming with PM Boris. Another Cromwell is arriving and the House of Common'ers is remaned House of the City, a bunch of Elite Bankers running UK.

  5. What a brilliant story. Young man goes off to one of the colonies and makes a happy life for himself. He's way better off with the life he has had instead of being a royal. Seems like such a great guy, too. –and he has a lovely family.

  6. Look for the decedents of Iestyn ap Gwrgan in wales in Glamorgan and Gwent who was deposed by the Normans in 1091 they were the real ancient British kings going back to Brutus 500 bc the English state don’t want you to know this they have tried to keep it secret,

  7. Henry IV doesn't matter, as the Royal Family's descent is from Henry VII, who was After Henry IV, and that his wife was daughter of Henry does not matter, as Henry became King of Himself, although it was not a wedding of the two families. It was not essential that she were of Royal blood, as neither was Anne Boleyn, etc. And James I (VI of Scotland) etc. "Disfunctonal Windsors"? is a putdown that affects Princess Anne, the Earl of Wessex, the Duke of CAmbridge, the very Queen ? Ridiculous and Unfair as well as Pretentious. What an unjust and unwarranted mention of 'the Divine Right of Kings", a propostion which No one is proposing ! Seems like a prissy republican distracction.

  8. In 1666, soon after the great fire of London, there were reports of various sightings of giant ants which had mutated due to chemicals being released in a storage depot near London Bridge..
    In November 1667, giant ants stormed Buckingham Palace and killed all the residents and took over the palace but the authorities covered it all up and the ants took on human form and they are the ancestors of the current royal family… 🐜🐜🐜🐜🐜🐜👑👸🐜🐜🐜🐜🐜🏃🏃🏃🐜🐜🏃🏃🏃🏃👪👪🌎🏫🏤🏥🏦🏨🏩🏬🏬

  9. Surprised that no-one has pointed out the man obviously wouldn't even exist, if the error hadn't occurred. Great fun though.

  10. Can't they exume the body of Edward IV and test his DNA? And then what if it proves he was NOT the legitimate heir? What an interesting scenario. What makes a king anyway? One bunch of buffoons would just replace another bunch of buffoons. Of course, the DNA of all the descendents of the rightful heir will need to be tested as well to make sure there was not a break in succession with illegitimate births in the line.

  11. I think the whole concept of inherited power is BS…I fully believe the individuals need to proof their ability to lead…not saying royal families do not have the ability (they are still in power)…but the judgement of their performance should be the people decision not some mumbo jumbo of devine rights etc….Revolutions have occured throughout history from this whole inherited power structure…one mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter. Hopefully we as Americans stay free and do not get persuaded by these silver tongued devils selling the Monarchy Idea! The drama of it all is enticing with the murder, intrigue and Shakesperien theatrics.

  12. It doesn't matter whom sits on phony thrones.
    All are tyrants, liars, thieves and murderers.
    How do you think they got there in the first place?

  13. Who Put Jews in camps England working with Iran s most wanted in NewYork Iran been Betrayed by these Iran's nuclear program the NY project they stole the money from Iran work with Iran to kill American s that's the contract s there agenda 21 kill jews and Egyptian first Jamaica Iran Syria all betrayed AMERICA and there country s all Confession were recorded the ones who were captured please turn yourselves in before American FBI and the other countries come for there own wanted

  14. HIs theory is bogus. The last Plantagenet king, Richard III was defeated by Henry Tudor (Henry VII) his wife's lineage was immaterial. After the last Stewart monarch died, Queen Anne, the Act of Settlement required a Protestant monarch. Fifty Catholic heirs were skipped over to reach George, the elector of Hanover, George I. This is how Elizabeth II eventually became queen.

  15. If Pommies and Aussies are so keen to bow to royalty, then it should at least be to the real heir of the throne.
    It's a stupid archaic institution and what really grinded my gears was when I learnt a few years ago that there was a secret law noone in the public was supposed to be aware of that allows the queen to veto laws.
    Naeh, time to get rid of the luciferian pedo crowd and until we can shut down the institution, welcome the son of now late Aussie Mike on the throne.

  16. You are right and wrong, sir. My line is legitimate, but not predominate. Brunswick(Windsor) will hold through the Tribulation if my understanding is correct. Philip is the center of this legacy and it's benefactor, next is Fergie.

  17. Actually, the Throne of England does not belong to the House of Wordsor or anyone else now. IT IS THE BIBLICAL THRONE OF DAVID THAT BELONGS TO CHRIST AT HIS SOON SECOND COMING.

  18. The true monarch of England and by default Britain should be the descendents of King Harold the second who was killed at Hastings in 1066.

  19. thats amazing news just amazing
    all of a sudden those royal peds in brit seem to look dirty looking and not worthy of any media and attention
    so yeah time to walk away and work at aust, being republic

  20. It is all a question of power. Legitimacy is second place or irrelevant. The monarchs of every country throughout history have routinely murdered their own family members to get rid of the threat that they posed. The most ruthless ones regularly come out on top. That's all that matters.
    This is the way of the World.

  21. I must admit…I wasn’t sure what to expect at the final reveal of King Michael I, but there is most definitely something about the man. Like an aura or presence that goes beyond his incredible family history.

  22. This should all be publicised & be good cause to fold up the whole monarchy nonsense.If I were a brit….Idbe incessedtosupport thesefreeloaders in luxury.

  23. The present royal s are not related to English kings maye cotland because osf the Stu art line.e ,the plantagenets were kings from early on to Henry 7 after the war of the Roses, so they a 're legal.

  24. I am the rightful King of England, I the descendant of Edward IV. Glory has left the shores of England because of the theft of the throne from the noble of House of York. My people I ask you to rise once more and be worthy of this historical hour, for blood alone moves the wheels of history, it is time for the restoration of the English Crown!

  25. Why make a fuss he says. He says he has studied this…I doubt that very much. Others perhaps. Dont forget his massive ties to the anti-royalist Labour Party.

  26. Hi Sir Tony, congrats btw….I've been trying to find out where those who call themselves Royal actually came from. There had to be a beginning yes? Love to see a docu from you about it! This was priceless & so refreshing. Imagine a clean sweep of the entire establishment!! A whole new Decent Family of Genuine Royal blood, Republicans, sweeping away this greedy, decadent, depraved gaggle of contemptible bozos….wow!! Think about the origins of, would you plse??

  27. so basically the windsors are defrauding the British tax payer of millions of pounds every year, surely an investigation is in the public interest.

  28. Yeah in doing research on these royals I wholeheartedly believe the crown was robbed taken by the Pict caiaanites….Its the only thing that makes sense.
    These so called royals have caused so much harm throughout history to ensure England will always have a black eye…. I agree we need to see some DNA.
    I have also been researching why castles and churches have been in ruin since the deportation of English Welsh and Scots to Australia….I dont doubt it if Nobels and Royals in line were deported to Australia after thier castles got sacked .

  29. What a refreshing change from the vile ogres that currently occupy Buckingham Palace!

  30. Tony when you can not get details in your opening lines right how much of the rest should we listen to. The royal family is not britains It is the UK s Royal family.

  31. Britain's real monarchy is the rothschild family, the royal family we see today are just puppets for the rothschild's.

  32. Yeah, it is what it is. Winners write the history, nothing's set in stone, until you put a last dot on it yourself. And then haters can hate, trolls can troll, but as the dogs bark, caravan moves. YOUR caravan, you are more than welcome to challenge, such is nature of whole existence.

  33. All this research, however interesting, is void since Henry VII (Tudor) became King by Right of Conquest. The facts he was married to the Daughter of Edward IV, whose legitimacy is questioned, is rather immaterial.

    Furthermore, Parliament Invited back the Exiled King Charles II in 1660, which then gave his claim weight as "Declared by Parliament, and by English Common Law"

    And finally, Parliament unseated James II, and replaced him with (successively) William & Mary (co rulers) and Anne, then George. Whereby the line of succession was secured.

  34. It’s good to know the truth, however, u mean to say, queen Elizabeth is not aware of this? If so, why did she not try to hide the supposedly true identity of the real monarch. The assumed complicit in princess Diana’s death was silenced🤷🏻‍♀️

  35. If all evidence presented was ever accurate, sh queen Elizabeth surrender the throne ? …Surprised citizen of Hawaii 🤷🏻‍♀️

  36. They took the news quite well! They seem like lovely people. I thoroughly enjoyed this program. Being American, we don't have royals, although we have had some illegitimate leaders!

  37. I think it's funny how you ignorant Brits even care about this. I think it's funny you allow a person to "rule" and absorb so much of the country's money simply because of what vagina they popped out of. I think it's funny that you morons don't find it funny! What a nation of fools.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Begin typing your search term above and press enter to search. Press ESC to cancel.

Back To Top